Saturday, April 10, 2010
Prospective Relocation Disapproved by Florida Supreme Court
In January 2010 the Florida Supreme Court reversed a case from the Second District Court of Appeal regarding relocation in a divorce proceeding. The Supreme Court case is Arthur v. Arthur, 35 Fla. L. Weekly S 38 (Fla. January 14, 2010), and the Court resolved a conflict between the Second District Court of Appeal (which originally decided the Arthur case, and a case from the First District Court of Appeal, Sylvester v. Sylvester, 992 So.2d 296 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the First District Court of Appeal and held that it was error for the trial court to grant a prospective relocation by a parent with a child and stated that if relocation is not supported or warranted at the time of trial, then the trial court should not order relocation at some point in the future. The decision regarding relocation must be determined based on the then existing facts and circumstances.
The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.